Visualization of NPI's June 2024 WA-03 poll finding
Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (D) and Joe Kent (R) are effectively tied in their rematch in Washington's 3rd Congressional District, a June 2024 survey conducted for the Northwest Progressive Institute has found. (NPI graphic)

First-term Demo­c­ra­t­ic Unit­ed States Rep­re­sen­ta­tive Marie Glue­senkamp Perez and her Repub­li­can rival Joe Kent are run­ning about even with each oth­er as the state’s Top Two win­now­ing elec­tion approach­es, a new North­west Pro­gres­sive Insti­tute sur­vey of Wash­ing­ton State’s 3rd Con­gres­sion­al Dis­trict has found. 

Asked who they’d back for Con­gress if the gen­er­al elec­tion were being held now, 46% of 649 like­ly Novem­ber 3rd Dis­trict vot­ers sur­veyed ear­li­er this month by Pub­lic Pol­i­cy Polling said they’d vote for Kent, while 45% said Glue­senkamp Perez. 

9% were not sure. 

Although Camas City Coun­cilmem­ber Leslie Lewallen is also run­ning as a Repub­li­can, Kent is Glue­senkamp Perez’s expect­ed gen­er­al elec­tion opponent. 

Kent — who holds many extreme and con­spir­a­to­r­i­al beliefs — is sup­port­ed by the Wash­ing­ton State Repub­li­can Par­ty and Don­ald Trump, leav­ing Lewallen with­out much of an open­ing. The state par­ty is so enthused about Kent that it has set up a joint fundrais­ing com­mit­tee with him. Check out this text from the foot­er of his web­site:

Paid for by the Joe Kent Vic­to­ry Fund, A joint fundrais­ing com­mit­tee autho­rized by and com­posed of Joe Kent for Con­gress, Keep Elect­ing New Tal­ent PAC, and the Wash­ing­ton State Repub­li­can Party.

Joe Kent Vic­to­ry Fund (“JFC”) is a joint fundrais­ing com­mit­tee com­posed of Joe Kent for Con­gress (the “Cam­paign”) Keep Elect­ing New Tal­ent PAC (the “LPAC”), and Wash­ing­ton State Repub­li­can Par­ty (each, a “Com­mit­tee,” and, col­lec­tive­ly, the “Com­mit­tees”). Any con­tri­bu­tion to the JFC per­mis­si­ble under the Fed­er­al Elec­tion Cam­paign Act, as amend­ed (“FECA”), from con­trib­u­tors who have not exceed­ed their applic­a­ble Fed­er­al con­tri­bu­tion lim­its, shall be allo­cat­ed among the Com­mit­tees pur­suant to FECA and the for­mu­la set forth in this Notice. Indi­vid­u­als or fed­er­al non-mul­ti­can­di­date PACs may con­tribute up to $21,600. Such con­tri­bu­tions shall be allo­cat­ed in the fol­low­ing order: 1. Cam­paign shall receive any con­tri­bu­tion not exceed­ing $3,300 for des­ig­na­tion to the 2024 pri­ma­ry elec­tion. 2. LPAC shall receive the next con­tri­bu­tion not exceed­ing $5,000 annu­al­ly. 3. Cam­paign shall receive the next con­tri­bu­tion not exceed­ing $3,300 for des­ig­na­tion to the 2024 gen­er­al elec­tion. 4. Wash­ing­ton State Repub­li­can Par­ty shall receive any remain­ing funds not to exceed $10,000 annually.

In 2022, Glue­senkamp Perez defeat­ed Kent by 2,629 votes after the two of them eclipsed long­time incum­bent Jaime Her­rera Beut­ler in the Top Two election. 

Repub­li­can vot­ers aban­doned Her­rera Beut­ler in droves after she coura­geous­ly vot­ed to impeach Trump for incit­ing the Jan­u­ary 6th insurrection. 

Her­rera Beut­ler is now seek­ing statewide office in Wash­ing­ton as one of sev­en can­di­dates for Com­mis­sion­er of Pub­lic Lands — although with­out the sup­port of the state par­ty, which endorsed anoth­er Repub­li­can, Sue Kuehl Ped­er­sen, instead. 

Many nation­al pun­dits and observers fig­ured WA-03 was still a safe Repub­li­can dis­trict even after Her­rera Beut­ler’s loss two years ago. NPI’s research showed oth­er­wise: in Sep­tem­ber of 2022, we released the only inde­pen­dent, cred­i­ble, pub­lic polling of the cycle for Wash­ing­ton’s 3rd Dis­trict, which strong­ly sug­gest­ed that Marie Glue­senkamp Perez had a real­is­tic chance of win­ning. In that post, I wrote: “It won’t be easy… but a Demo­c­ra­t­ic vic­to­ry in WA-03 this cycle is an achiev­able objective.”

Glue­senkamp Perez trailed Kent by three points in that 2022 polling, but went on to win, just as our team argued that she could. This cycle, Glue­senkamp Perez is the incum­bent and is even bet­ter posi­tioned to com­pete. Despite the dis­tric­t’s Repub­li­can tilt, she’s effec­tive­ly tied with Joe Kent out of the gate in our lat­est sur­vey. She’s also run­ning ahead of the rest of the fed­er­al Demo­c­ra­t­ic tick­et in the dis­trict. Let’s take a look at the ini­tial horser­ace num­bers for each of the fed­er­al races in WA-03:

QUESTION: If the elec­tion for Pres­i­dent of the Unit­ed States were being held today, would you vote for Demo­c­rat Joe Biden or Repub­li­can Don­ald Trump?

WA-03 ANSWERS:

  • Don­ald Trump (R): 50%
  • Joe Biden (D): 45%
  • Not sure: 5%

A quick aside: This is a pret­ty good num­ber for Biden con­sid­er­ing how Repub­li­can this dis­trict is. It’s vot­ed for Trump before, and it may well again this November.

QUESTION: If the elec­tion for Unit­ed States Sen­ate were being held today, and the can­di­dates were Demo­c­rat Maria Cantwell and Repub­li­can Raul Gar­cia, who would you vote for?

WA-03 ANSWERS:

  • Raul Gar­cia (R): 47%
  • Maria Cantwell (D): 43%
  • Not sure: 10% 

This was also not sur­pris­ing giv­en that Demo­c­ra­t­ic Sen­a­tor Pat­ty Mur­ray like­wise trailed her Repub­li­can chal­lenger Tiffany Smi­ley in our 2022 WA-03 polling. 

QUESTION: If the elec­tion for Con­gress were being held today and the can­di­dates were Demo­c­rat Marie Glue­senkamp Perez and Repub­li­can Joe Kent, who would you vote for?

WA-03 ANSWERS:

  • Joe Kent: 46%
  • Marie Glue­senkamp Perez: 45%
  • Not sure: 9%

Our poll con­sist­ed of inter­views with 649 like­ly 2024 vot­ers who were sur­veyed from June 11th — 12th by Pub­lic Pol­i­cy Polling. 47% par­tic­i­pat­ed via land­line and 53% par­tic­i­pat­ed online via invi­ta­tion sent through text mes­sag­ing. The sur­vey has a mar­gin of error of +/- 3.9% at the 95% con­fi­dence interval.

To reit­er­ate: The ques­tions above appeared in our sur­vey before any ques­tions about the can­di­dates’ pri­or­i­ties or their state­ments on the cam­paign trail. 

WA-03 tru­ly is a dis­trict that deserves a “tossup” rat­ing… it could go either way this Novem­ber. It’s Repub­li­cans’ best pick­up oppor­tu­ni­ty in the region, and it’s the seat Democ­rats will have to work the hard­est to defend. Every can­vass, every phonebank, and every dol­lar donat­ed is going to matter.

For­tu­nate­ly for Glue­senkamp Perez and Democ­rats, our polling finds that sup­port for key issues and pri­or­i­ties they are com­mit­ted to advanc­ing in Con­gress is increas­ing among vot­ers in the 3rd Con­gres­sion­al Dis­trict. In 2022, we asked vot­ers in the dis­trict about sup­port for repro­duc­tive rights, police reform, the PRO Act, and democ­ra­cy reform. We asked about those same issues again in this survey. 

Let’s run through the issue findings.

Reproductive rights

First, repro­duc­tive rights.

In 2022, we found 57% in sup­port of the Wom­en’s Health Pro­tec­tion Act and 36% opposed, with 7% not sure. Total sup­port remains at 57% in this sur­vey, with slight­ly greater inten­si­ty (a major­i­ty are strong­ly sup­port­ive now, rather than just a plurality):

QUESTION: Do you strong­ly sup­port, some­what sup­port, some­what oppose, or strong­ly oppose the Women’s Health Pro­tec­tion Act, which would give Amer­i­cans the legal right to deter­mine whether and when to end a preg­nan­cy, and to pro­tect a health care provider’s abil­i­ty to pro­vide repro­duc­tive health ser­vices, includ­ing abor­tion services?

ANSWERS:

  • Sup­port: 57% 
    • Strong­ly sup­port: 50%
    • Some­what sup­port: 7%
  • Oppose: 38%
    • Some­what oppose: 9%
    • Strong­ly oppose: 29%
  • Not sure: 6%

Repro­duc­tive rights was a top issue for Marie Glue­senkamp Perez in 2022 and will con­tin­ue to be this year. Today is the two-year anniver­sary of the hor­rif­ic Dobbs deci­sion, and the issue remains potent for Democ­rats across the coun­try, as Repub­li­cans work fever­ish­ly to strip away wom­en’s access to repro­duc­tive health­care services. 

Labor rights

Next, labor rights. In 2022, we found major­i­ty sup­port (53%) for the PRO Act, and 26% opposed, with 21% not sure. Sup­port has since gone up by sev­en points: 

QUESTION: Do you strong­ly sup­port, some­what sup­port, some­what oppose, or strong­ly oppose amend­ing fed­er­al labor laws to give more work­ers cur­rent­ly clas­si­fied as con­trac­tors the right to col­lec­tive­ly bar­gain for high­er wages and bet­ter work­ing con­di­tions, pre­vent employ­ers from hold­ing manda­to­ry meet­ings for the pur­pose of dis­cour­ag­ing their employ­ees from union­iz­ing, and tough­en penal­ties on com­pa­nies that retal­i­ate against work­ers who try to form a union?

ANSWERS:

  • Sup­port: 60% 
    • Strong­ly sup­port: 43%
    • Some­what sup­port: 17%
  • Oppose: 22%
    • Some­what oppose: 7%
    • Strong­ly oppose: 15%
  • Not sure: 18%

Police reform

Next, police reform. In 2022, we found that 61% of WA-03 vot­ers sup­port­ed the George Floyd Jus­tice in Polic­ing Act, while only 25% were opposed and 14% weren’t sure. Sup­port has increased by three points for this leg­is­la­tion to 64%:

QUESTION: Do you strong­ly sup­port, some­what sup­port, some­what oppose, or strong­ly oppose cre­at­ing a new fed­er­al law to hold law enforce­ment account­able for mis­con­duct in court, require police depart­ments to report inap­pro­pri­ate use of force and racial pro­fil­ing inci­dents to a nation­al reg­istry, and reform police train­ing and poli­cies to make civil­ian-law enforce­ment inter­ac­tions safer?

ANSWERS:

  • Sup­port: 64% 
    • Strong­ly sup­port: 43%
    • Some­what sup­port: 21%
  • Oppose: 24%
    • Some­what oppose: 10%
    • Strong­ly oppose: 14%
  • Not sure: 12%

Democracy reform

And final­ly, democ­ra­cy reform. In 2022, 63% of our respon­dents sup­port­ed the con­tours of the For the Peo­ple Act, while 20% were opposed and 17% were not sure. 

Sup­port has now risen to 70%. Yes, 70%. Sev­en out of ten vot­ers are in favor! 

QUESTION: Do you strong­ly sup­port, some­what sup­port, some­what oppose, or strong­ly oppose chang­ing the Unit­ed States’ elec­tion laws to expand vot­ing rights, change cam­paign finance rules to lessen the influ­ence of mon­ey in pol­i­tics, ban par­ti­san ger­ry­man­der­ing, and cre­ate new ethics rules for fed­er­al officeholders?

ANSWERS:

  • Sup­port: 70% 
    • Strong­ly sup­port: 57%
    • Some­what sup­port: 13%
  • Oppose: 13%
    • Some­what oppose: 4%
    • Strong­ly oppose: 9%
  • Not sure: 17%

Marie Glue­senkamp Perez will find a very enthu­si­as­tic recep­tion for her anti-cor­rup­tion plat­form among vot­ers in the 3rd Dis­trict. The irre­spon­si­ble, uneth­i­cal, and appalling behav­ior of our ultra MAGA Supreme Court jus­tices Samuel Ali­to and Clarence Thomas appear to have made this issue even more potent for Democrats. 

Want more data? 

If the above has whet­ted your appetite for WA-03 polling, we hope you’ll con­sid­er becom­ing a sub­scriber to The Chi­nook Bea­con, The Cas­ca­dia Advo­cate’s newest sib­ling pub­li­ca­tion. The Bea­con, which launched last month, is a newslet­ter avail­able exclu­sive­ly to pay­ing sub­scribers that pro­vides deep insights from our research as well as com­men­tary on elec­toral and polit­i­cal trends. Sub­scrip­tions cost $20/month or $240/year, and you can also become a Found­ing Mem­ber for $600/year.

The next edi­tion of The Bea­con, due out lat­er this week, will be WA-03 focused. 

Takeaways

Joe Kent was a for­mi­da­ble oppo­nent for Marie Glue­senkamp Perez in 2022 and will be again — but no one should doubt that he is beat­able. Our research shows that Glue­senkamp Perez is hold­ing her own in a Trump dis­trict… and with­out the ben­e­fit of ranked choice vot­ing, which two of her Blue Dog col­leagues in the House Demo­c­ra­t­ic cau­cus have made use of. Alaska’s Mary Pel­to­la and Maine’s Jared Gold­en have both ben­e­fit­ed from their states’ use of RCV in past elec­tions and may again this year. 

Like Glue­senkamp Perez, they have to run for reelec­tion in places that are expect­ed to sup­port Don­ald Trump. But she must win in a dis­trict that uses first past the post. 

Glue­senkamp Perez’s cam­paign knows they have to be proac­tive to win. That’s why this morn­ing, they went up on the air in the dis­trict with their first TV spot of the cycle. 

Here’s the spot:

And here’s what the cam­paign had to say about it and the stakes this year:

Glue­senkamp Perez faces an inevitably expen­sive rematch in Novem­ber against far-right extrem­ist Joe Kent, who she defeat­ed in 2022 by two votes per precinct in one of the country’s clos­est House races.

Joe Kent wants to ban all immi­gra­tion for 20 years to ensure a white racial major­i­ty, calls for a nation­al abor­tion ban, dis­putes the out­come of the 2020 pres­i­den­tial elec­tion and believes indict­ed mem­bers of the Jan­u­ary 6th mob are “polit­i­cal pris­on­ers”, refers to Vladimir Putin as “rea­son­able”, and wants to arrest Dr. Antho­ny Fau­ci for mur­der, among oth­er dan­ger­ous and polit­i­cal­ly unpop­u­lar views.

Bor­der Security

The 30-sec­ond spot high­lights the con­sis­tent pres­sure Glue­senkamp Perez has put on Pres­i­dent Biden since she took office last year, espe­cial­ly on bor­der secu­ri­ty. Glue­senkamp Perez helped lead a group of 5 Democ­rats and 5 Repub­li­cans who pushed for stronger bor­der secu­ri­ty mea­sures this win­ter, after the Sen­ate and the White House gave up on find­ing a compromise.

Glue­senkamp Perez also led a group of House Democ­rats this spring in repeat­ed­ly demand­ing Pres­i­dent Biden take urgent action to empow­er the Bor­der Patrol and secure the South­ern border.

Law Enforce­ment

Glue­senkamp Perez’s bipar­ti­san work to com­bat fen­tanyl and sup­port pub­lic safe­ty in South­west Wash­ing­ton is anoth­er theme of the TV ad, which fea­tures tes­ti­mo­ni­als from two coun­ty sher­iffs in her dis­trict — one sher­iff an elect­ed Repub­li­can and the oth­er an elect­ed independent.

The ad also high­lights Glue­senkamp Perez’s sole endorse­ment from Washington’s largest and old­est police union, the Wash­ing­ton Coun­cil of Police & Sheriff’s Deputies, as well as the Van­cou­ver Fire­fight­ers, the largest IAFF local in her district.

State of the Race

Glue­senkamp Perez is the only Demo­c­rat run­ning in WA-03. The dis­trict, which Trump won twice, was drawn in 2021 to elect a Repub­li­can, but has shown a will­ing­ness to sup­port main­stream, inde­pen­dent-mind­ed can­di­dates of both par­ties like Glue­senkamp Perez.

Glue­senkamp Perez can’t win with­out at least some Repub­li­can crossover sup­port, so she’s mak­ing it clear to Repub­li­can and Repub­li­can-lean­ing vot­ers at the out­set that she under­stands their con­cerns and is work­ing to address them in Congress. 

Demo­c­ra­t­ic vot­ers appear to appre­ci­ate that Glue­senkamp Perez needs to make these over­tures in order to pro­vide effec­tive rep­re­sen­ta­tion and secure reelec­tion in a dis­trict that is like­ly vot­ing for Trump again. Our polling sug­gests the vast major­i­ty of Demo­c­ra­t­ic vot­ers in the dis­trict are behind her and ready to vote for her this sum­mer and autumn. That sup­port from the base will be crit­i­cal in a race that will prob­a­bly be the clos­est fed­er­al con­test in the region and has the poten­tial to go to a recount. 

About the author

Andrew Villeneuve is the founder and executive director of the Northwest Progressive Institute, as well as the founder of NPI's sibling, the Northwest Progressive Foundation. He has worked to advance progressive causes for over two decades as a strategist, speaker, author, and organizer. Andrew is also a cybersecurity expert, a veteran facilitator, a delegate to the Washington State Democratic Central Committee, and a member of the Climate Reality Leadership Corps.

Adjacent posts

Leave a comment

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our Commenting Guidelines. If you submit any links to other websites in your comment or in the Website field, these will be published at our discretion. Please read our statement of Privacy Practices before commenting to understand how we collect and use submissions to the Cascadia Advocate. Your comment must be submitted with a name and email address as noted below. We will not publish or share your email address.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *