Senator Maria Cantwell speaking at a press conference
Senator Maria Cantwell speaks at a press conference to announce the publication of a new report detailing the impact of the Dobbs decision. Cantwell was joined by Dr. Elizabeth Harrington, a University of Washington OB/GYN and assistant professor, Jacquiline Blanco, RN, a Public Policy Committee member at the Association of Women’s Health, Obstetric, and Neonatal Nurses, Grayson Dempsey, Director of Public Affairs at the Lilith Clinic, and Em Stone, Public Policy Director at the Washington State Domestic Violence Coalition. (Photo courtesy of Senator Cantwell's office)

Wash­ing­ton State’s repro­duc­tive health care sys­tem has been strug­gling to accom­mo­date surg­ing demand from out-of-state patients in the two years fol­low­ing the Unit­ed States Supreme Court’s hor­rif­ic Dobbs deci­sion over­turn­ing Roe v. Wade, a new report from Sen­a­tor Maria Cantwell (D‑WA) detailed on Monday.

The report paints a dire pic­ture of access in neigh­bor­ing Ida­ho, where restric­tions have com­pelled doc­tors to rec­om­mend patients buy air ambu­lance insur­ance should they need to be flown to Wash­ing­ton to be treat­ed in a life-threat­en­ing situation.

“In Ida­ho, we’ve been fly­ing out about a patient per week to Utah or Ore­gon or Wash­ing­ton because the fetus is non­vi­able or the life of the moth­er is at risk,” Ida­ho Physi­cian Well-Being Action Col­lab­o­ra­tive Co-Chair Dr. Edward McEach­ern said. 

“And they’re not able to find some­one to pro­vide them care in Ida­ho. That heli­copter ride can cost over sev­en­ty grand — that bank­rupts families.”

Unsur­pris­ing­ly, patients from states with restric­tive abor­tion laws have account­ed for much of the increase in Washington’s ser­vices. The report says that Wash­ing­ton has seen a 56% increase in patients from Ida­ho, where abor­tion is out­lawed in almost all cir­cum­stances. Wash­ing­ton has also treat­ed a grow­ing quan­ti­ty of patients from twen­ty oth­er states, like Texas, which has sent three times as many patients as Idaho.

Despite post-Roe restric­tions on abor­tion in as many as twen­ty-two states, the num­ber of abor­tions per­formed in the U.S. is at its high­est in over a decade, accord­ing to the Guttmach­er Insti­tute. Much of the rise is due to increased usage of med­ica­tion abor­tion like mifepri­s­tone. At the same time, the med­ical sys­tems of states where repro­duc­tive care remains acces­si­ble have tak­en on the bur­den of treat­ing many patients who oth­er­wise would not be able to abort their pregnancies. 

While Wash­ing­ton has con­tin­ued to pro­vide essen­tial repro­duc­tive health care ser­vices to patients in need, Planned Par­ent­hood — which pro­vides abor­tion ser­vices — has report­ed longer wait­ing times, and Dr. Sarah Prager of the Uni­ver­si­ty of Wash­ing­ton Medicine’s Depart­ment of Obstet­rics and Gyne­col­o­gy has said that they some­times can­not per­form sched­uled pro­ce­dures due to the influx in out-of-state patients. Ore­gon Health and Sci­ence Uni­ver­si­ty even report­ed a surge in patients from Washington.

Map of where repro­duc­tive health­care has been out­lawed. White = care still acces­si­ble, the dark­est maroon = elim­i­nat­ed, and oth­er shades of red indi­cate degrees of restric­tions (Cour­tesy of Planned Parenthood) 

Anoth­er Wash­ing­ton doc­tor quot­ed in the report said that the state had become a “safe­ty net for med­ical care, but that we don’t sub­sti­tute going to your doc­tor and get­ting reg­u­lar screenings.”

Repro­duc­tive health care restric­tions aren’t just tax­ing the health sys­tems of pro-free­dom states, how­ev­er. Cantwell’s report notes that OB-GYNs are leav­ing Ida­ho and wors­en­ing med­ical pro­fes­sion­al short­ages, while some med­ical school grad­u­ates are active­ly avoid­ing restric­tive states for their res­i­den­cies so they can learn the full suite of med­ical pro­ce­dures nec­es­sary for their career.

Per Ida­ho Med­ical Asso­ci­a­tion CEO Susie Keller: “every time there’s and adverse court deci­sion, or a lack of action by the state leg­is­la­ture, we typ­i­cal­ly see a bump in the num­ber of physi­cians that leave. We just con­clud­ed our Ida­ho leg­isla­tive ses­sion at the begin­ning of April. And since then, we’ve doc­u­ment­ed five more doc­tors who are leaving.”

A U.S. Supreme Court deci­sion released yes­ter­day rein­stat­ed a pause on some of Idaho’s restric­tions, mean­ing that patients can, for now, receive an abor­tion in the state if their health is at risk. Though the rul­ing will bring mod­est relief to patients and health­care providers, Wash­ing­ton expects to con­tin­ue to deal with ele­vat­ed num­bers of out-of-state patients requir­ing care mov­ing forward.

About the author

Owen Averill is the Northwest Progressive Institute's Federal Correspondent and an aficionado of all things Washington State. His professional experience includes internships on Capitol Hill, for Democratic congressional campaigns, and at the Brookings Institution. When he’s not writing about Washingtonians in D.C., he is running, reading, watching the Sounders, or catching up on Irish politics.

Adjacent posts

Leave a comment

By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our Commenting Guidelines. If you submit any links to other websites in your comment or in the Website field, these will be published at our discretion. Please read our statement of Privacy Practices before commenting to understand how we collect and use submissions to the Cascadia Advocate. Your comment must be submitted with a name and email address as noted below. We will not publish or share your email address.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *