Donald Trump with his eyes closed
Donald Trump in court in New York (Pool photo by Mark Peterson)

Don­ald Trump is now a con­vict­ed felon.

The long­time New York res­i­dent, who cur­rent­ly lives in Flori­da, today became the first ex‑U.S. Pres­i­dent to be con­vict­ed of a crime when a jury of New York­ers found him guilty on thir­ty-four counts of fal­si­fy­ing busi­ness records. Trump’s sen­tenc­ing has been sched­uled for July 11th by Judge Juan Mer­chan, who will decide what his pun­ish­ment will be. 

The charges car­ry a max­i­mum sen­tence of twen­ty years in prison. How­ev­er, the law does not oblig­ate Judge Mer­chan to incar­cer­ate Trump. He has a big deci­sion to make. 

A sub­dued Trump walked out of the cour­t­house after the ver­dict was read to react and pro­ceed­ed to whine about how “rigged” the tri­al was, though he could not muster his usu­al brava­do. Com­menters wry­ly observed it was a “low ener­gy” gripefest. 

Repub­li­cans imme­di­ate­ly began howl­ing in protest, tak­ing their cues from Trump, while Democ­rats char­ac­ter­ized the ver­dict as a long over­due reckoning. 

No one is above the law is the theme of almost every state­ment we’ve received. 

“In New York today, we saw that no one is above the law,” said Biden-Har­ris 2024 Com­mu­ni­ca­tions Direc­tor Michael Tyler. “Don­ald Trump has always mis­tak­en­ly believed he would nev­er face con­se­quences for break­ing the law for his own per­son­al gain. But today’s ver­dict does not change the fact that the Amer­i­can peo­ple face a sim­ple real­i­ty. There is still only one way to keep Don­ald Trump out of the Oval Office: at the bal­lot box. Con­vict­ed felon or not, Trump will be the Repub­li­can nom­i­nee for president.” 

“The threat Trump pos­es to our democ­ra­cy has nev­er been greater. He is run­ning an increas­ing­ly unhinged cam­paign of revenge and ret­ri­bu­tion, pledg­ing to be a dic­ta­tor ‘on day one’ and call­ing for our Con­sti­tu­tion to be ‘ter­mi­nat­ed’ so he can regain and keep pow­er. A sec­ond Trump term means chaos, rip­ping away Amer­i­cans’ free­doms and foment­ing polit­i­cal vio­lence – and the Amer­i­can peo­ple will reject it this November.”

“Whether cit­i­zen, can­di­date, or pres­i­dent, no one is above the law,” agreed NextGen PAC Pres­i­dent Cristi­na Tzintzún Ramirez. “When elect­ed offi­cials break the law, they must be held account­able. From pay­ing off peo­ple to keep vot­ers from learn­ing of his scan­dals, to incit­ing a dead­ly insur­rec­tion on Jan­u­ary 6th, to threat­en­ing our nation­al secu­ri­ty by ille­gal­ly retain­ing clas­si­fied doc­u­ments and obstruct­ing jus­tice, Don­ald Trump has repeat­ed­ly jeop­ar­dized Amer­i­can democ­ra­cy by stok­ing chaos and dis­or­der, and today’s results only under­score that truth.” 

“Today’s deci­sion was made by a jury of every­day Amer­i­cans, who weighed the evi­dence and found the for­mer President’s actions to be a crime. And, with more tri­als to come, this is just the start of Trump’s prob­lems. Young vot­ers are pay­ing atten­tion, and we will not stand to have a cor­rupt, fas­cist, and extrem­ist leader guid­ing our coun­try into the future. Trump and MAGA Repub­li­cans must be held account­able. They will keep chip­ping away at our free­doms until they face the full con­se­quences for their crimes.”

“He had it com­ing,” said Analil­ia Mejia and DaMareo Coop­er, the co-exec­u­tive direc­tors of the Cen­ter for Pop­u­lar Democ­ra­cy. “Trump’s lat­est attempt to defraud the Amer­i­can peo­ple has been right­ful­ly dealt with. It’s about time. Despite the lies that Trump will con­tin­ue to ped­dle, this case has proven that no one is above the law.”

“Today’s ver­dict out of New York affirms what the Wash­ing­ton State Demo­c­ra­t­ic Par­ty has been say­ing for more than eight years – Con­vict­ed Felon Don­ald Trump is whol­ly unfit to lead our nation,” said State Par­ty Chair Shasti Conrad. 

“His con­vic­tion today by a jury of his peers demon­strates the lengths Con­vict­ed Felon Trump will go to and the laws he will break to get what he wants – anoth­er four years of pow­er at the expense of hard-work­ing Amer­i­cans. The Wash­ing­ton State Demo­c­ra­t­ic Par­ty will nev­er stop fight­ing for a more per­fect union, which is why we will con­tin­ue to resist Don­ald Trump’s cam­paign of lies, grift, and auto­crat­ic desires with every fiber of our being every minute of every day until the elec­tion is over and we have pre­vent­ed the end of democ­ra­cy… again.”

The indict­ment which led to today’s tri­al can be read here.

The records at issue in the case were proved by the pros­e­cu­tion to have been fal­si­fied in 2017, which was after Trump moved into the White House. The thir­ty-four records were fal­si­fied over the span of almost an entire year, with the first of the charges dat­ing to Feb­ru­ary of 2017 and the last to Decem­ber of 2017. 

The Peo­ple of the State of New York v. Don­ald J. Trump is often called “a hush mon­ey case.” But it’s real­ly about the fal­si­fi­ca­tion of busi­ness records. Pay­ing hush mon­ey isn’t nec­es­sar­i­ly a crime, where­as fal­si­fy­ing busi­ness records is a crime. 

And Don­ald Trump did it with the intent to com­mit or con­ceal anoth­er crime.

He prob­a­bly nev­er imag­ined any­one would suc­ceed in hold­ing him account­able for his law­break­ing. But Dis­trict Attor­ney Alvin Bragg brought a strong case. His team had to work around the cred­i­bil­i­ty prob­lems of Trump’s for­mer fix­er Michael Cohen, one of their key wit­ness­es. They pre­vailed, secur­ing a guilty ver­dict on all thir­ty-four counts.

Guilty on all thir­ty-four counts.

Kudos to the jury for their ser­vice in this case and for tak­ing their respon­si­bil­i­ties seriously.

Many Trump syco­phants lashed out at Judge Mer­chan fol­low­ing the ver­dict, claim­ing he had it in for Trump. But that’s non­sense: Mer­chan has demon­strat­ed through­out the case that he is tough and fair. NBC’s Dareh Gre­go­ri­an and Adam Reiss report­ed last year that Mer­chan “is a vet­er­an jurist with a rep­u­ta­tion for being stern yet compassionate.”

They talked to attor­neys who have expe­ri­ence inter­act­ing with Merchan: 

“He’s a seri­ous jurist, smart and even tem­pered,” said Ron Kuby, a long­time defense lawyer in Man­hat­tan. “He’s not one of those judges who yells at lawyers, and is char­ac­ter­ized as a no-non­sense judge. But he’s always in con­trol of the courtroom.”

Bar­ry Kamins, a New York judge turned defense lawyer, said his 60-year-old for­mer col­league “is well-known, even in dif­fi­cult cas­es, to exhib­it excel­lent tem­pera­ment, integri­ty and a sol­id knowl­edge of the law.”

Those tes­ti­mo­ni­als are irrel­e­vant to Trump’s enablers, of course. 

They oppose any jus­tice or account­abil­i­ty for Trump’s wrong­do­ing. Instead of respect­ing the jury ver­dict, they plan to go on the attack. They’ll try to use the ver­dict to rile up their base and raise mon­ey, and some of them may encour­age vio­lence against the judge, the jury, and the pros­e­cu­tors. Judge Mer­chan’s secu­ri­ty should be strength­ened, and every juror who par­tic­i­pat­ed in this case should be pro­vid­ed with a secu­ri­ty detail. 

No one involved in bring­ing Trump to jus­tice should be left at risk of harm from the cult that wor­ships Trump and wants to help him over­turn Amer­i­can democracy. 

About the author

Andrew Villeneuve is the founder and executive director of the Northwest Progressive Institute, as well as the founder of NPI's sibling, the Northwest Progressive Foundation. He has worked to advance progressive causes for over two decades as a strategist, speaker, author, and organizer. Andrew is also a cybersecurity expert, a veteran facilitator, a delegate to the Washington State Democratic Central Committee, and a member of the Climate Reality Leadership Corps.

Adjacent posts

Join the Conversation

3 Comments

  1. The indict­ment was sup­posed to sink Don­ald Trump. Instead, it strength­ened him.
    Now this con­vic­tion is sup­posed to sink Don­ald Trump. Instead, it will like­ly strength­en him even more.

    1. You’re view­ing today’s events through an elec­toral lens, John. But con­trary to what you seem to be imply­ing, this case was­n’t brought to hurt Don­ald Trump’s elec­toral prospects. It was brought because we are, at least for now, still a coun­try of laws and a coun­try where the rule of law mat­ters. Don­ald Trump com­mit­ted felonies; Dis­trict Attor­ney Alvin Bragg held him account­able. That’s his respon­si­bil­i­ty as a pros­e­cu­tor. He and his team did their jobs and secured a conviction. 

      Our team had no expec­ta­tion that the indict­ment would “sink” Trump. We expect­ed Trump would try to use the case to his advan­tage for fundrais­ing — and he has. 

      This is a mat­ter of right and wrong. Don­ald Trump did wrong and does­n’t deserve a pass for that wrong­do­ing. It does­n’t mat­ter what elec­toral fall­out results from bring­ing this case — doing so was in the inter­est of jus­tice, and this con­vic­tion serves justice.

      As for Trump’s elec­toral strength: his Elec­toral Col­lege vic­to­ry in 2016 came after slim wins in three key states and then he and the Repub­li­cans pro­ceed­ed to have three very bad elec­tions cycles in a row — 2018, 2020, 2022. There was end­less lofty talk of Repub­li­can dom­i­nance and red waves. Then the vot­ers vot­ed, and Repub­li­cans lost, over and over and over. You your­self told me that Democ­rats did­n’t have a chance in the Geor­gia runoffs back in Novem­ber of 2020. You pre­dict­ed Mitch McConnell would con­trol the Sen­ate in Jan­u­ary of 2021. You were wrong. 

      None of us knows the future, so it’s easy to be wrong. That’s why pre­dic­tions such as the one you just made are best not made to begin with.

      1. I guess the record set­ting $53 mil­lion con­tributed to the Repub­li­cans in the 24 hours after this ver­dict indi­cates most Amer­i­cans agree with this judge… does any­body know how much was con­tributed to the Democ­rats after the verdict?

Leave a comment
By submitting a comment, you agree to abide by our Commenting Guidelines. If you submit any links to other websites in your comment or in the Website field, these will be published at our discretion. Please read our statement of Privacy Practices before commenting to understand how we collect and use submissions to the Cascadia Advocate. Your comment must be submitted with a name and email address as noted below. We will not publish or share your email address.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *